Farmer Frank

Searchβ¦

WELCOME TO FARMER FRANK

3-PHASE ROLLOUT

MECHANICS

FUTURE TOKENOMICS

πΉ

Weighted Shares

β

Weighted shares (*issue rewards* to NFT bond holders.

`WS`

) for a bond is calculated by multiplying Unweighted Shares by the NFT level weight index. This metrics is utilized to To be clear:

This means that at the time of issuing, the

`WS`

of a Frank NFT Share will simply be its `US`

multiplied by its weight. Share level

Weight

US

WS

1

1.00

10

10

2

1.05

100

105

3

1.10

1000

1100

4

1.15

5000

5750

When compounding reinvested revenue as explained in the previous page, also

`WS`

increase.$4L_1 + 4L_2 = \begin{cases}
\text{US} = 4 \cdot 10 + 4 \cdot 100 = 440\\
\text{WS} = 4 \cdot 10 + 4 \cdot 105 = 460\\
\text{TVL} = 4 \cdot 10 + 4 \cdot 100 = 440
\end{cases}$

Let's reconsider step (3). Instead of reinvesting all revenue, we will be splitting equally the amount we reward (Reward Issuance

$I_R$

) and the amount we reinvest (Share Issuance $I_S$

). $I_S = 50\% \text{ Revenue} = 110, \quad I_R = 50\% \text { Revenue} = 110$

$I_S$

βThe Shares Reward will now be:

$I_{S, L=1} = 2.5 \text{ Shares}, \quad I_{S, L=2} = 25 \text{ Shares}$

$I_R$

- Part of the revenue rewarded to bond holders. Rewards issued are divided between bonds according to their To calculate how many JOE tokens a bond holder is entitled to claim per bond, we must calculate that bond's percentage of ownership over all weighted shares.

$I_{R, L} = \frac{\text{WS}_{L}}{\text{WS}} \cdot I_R$

- β$I_{R, L}$: Rewards issued to a bond of level$L$.
- β$\text{WS}_L$: Unweighted shares of a bond of level$L$.

Thus:

- β$I_{R, L=1} = 2.39 \text{ JOE}$β
- β$I_{R, L=2} = 25.11 \text{ JOE}$β

As you can see, this time Level 2 NFT holders are at an advantage as they gain slightly more than what they would've gained if rewards were distributed proportionally (with

`US`

), gaining 25.21 instead of 25. On the other hand, Level 1 NFT holders are at a disadvantage as they gain 2.29 instead of 2.5.Furthermore, as

`US`

increase when rewards get compounded so do `WS`

. β

Why creating a two share system?

If we had kept solely the weighted shares, when compounding rewards we were giving higher-level bond holders an exponential advantage compared to lower level bond holders. This would occur because perpetually compounding rewards taking into account bond level weight would eventually lead to an unsustainable gap between low level bonds and high level bonds.

By taking into account weight only when distributing rewards (and not when auto-compounding) we still give an advantage to higher level bond holders, without putting an unbearable burden on low level bonds.

Last modified 5mo ago

Copy link